首页 | 期刊简介 | 编委会 | 投稿指南 | 常用下载 | 联系我们 | 期刊订阅 | In English
引用本文:李义军,李 婷,王 平,孙成志,蔡晶晶,孙成波.日本囊对虾(Marsupenaeus japonicus)3 个野生种群和 1 个养殖种群的形态差异与判别分析.海洋与湖沼,2010,41(4):500-504.
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器  关闭
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 2933次   下载 2644 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
日本囊对虾(Marsupenaeus japonicus)3 个野生种群和 1 个养殖种群的形态差异与判别分析
李义军1, 李 婷1, 王 平2, 孙成志2, 蔡晶晶2, 孙成波1
1.广东海洋大学水产学院;2.海南省昌江南疆生物技术有限公司
摘要:
采用 3种多元分析方法, 对 3个野生种群和 1个养殖种群的 13个形态比例参数进行比较研究。聚类分析结果表明, 广东湛江和海南临高的种群形态最接近, 福建厦门种群的趋异程度最大。主成分分析构建了 6 个主成分, 其贡献率分别为: 第 1 主成分 23.084%, 第 2 主成分 17.976%, 第 3 主成分 15.321%, 第 4 主成分 13.84%, 第 5 主成分 12.707%, 第 6 主成分 7.770%, 累积贡献率为90.699%。逐步判别选入 6 个贡献率较大的性状进行判别分析, F 检验结果显示, 4 个种群形态差异显著(P<0.01); 同时建立了 4 个种群的判别函数, 其判别准确率 P1P2 均为 100%。 综合判别率为 100%。3种多元分析结果均认为, 4个种群日本囊对虾在形态上已产生一定程度的差异, 且集中表现在体重、头胸甲的性状上。
关键词:  日本囊对虾, 形态差异, 聚类分析, 判别分析, 主成分分析
DOI:10.11693/hyhz201004005005
分类号:
基金项目:海南省重点科技计划项目, 090706 号; 海南省星火产业带专项资金项目, HNXH200903 号; 科技部农业科技成果转化资金项目, 2010GB2E200382 号。
附件
ANALYSIS OF MORPHOLOGICAL VARIATIONS AMONG THREE WILD AND ONE CULTIVATION POPULATIONS OF MARSUPENAEUS JAPONICUS
LI Yi-Jun1, LI Ting1, WANG Ping2, SUN Cheng-Zhi2, CAI Jing-Jing2, SUN Cheng-Bo1
1.Fisheries College of Guangdong Ocean University;2.Hainan Changjiang Nanjiang Bio-Technology Co., Ltd
Abstract:
Morphological differences among four groups of Marsupenaeus japonicus were studied with 13 morphological parameters using three multivariation analysis methods (cluster analysis, discriminant analysis, and component analysis). Cluster analysis showed that clams from the Guangdong Zhanjiang and Hainan Lingao population were rather similar in morphology, whereas the Fujian Xiamen population differed greatly from other populations. Through principal component analysis, six principal components were established, with their contributory rates being 23.084%, 17.976%, 15.321%, 13.84%, 12.707%, and 7.770%, respectively, and the cumulative contributory rate being 90.699%. The stepwise discrimination analysis revealed that the four populations differed significantly in morphology (P<0.01). Further, the discrimination functions of the four populations were set up, the discrimination accuracy being 100% for both P1 and P2, and the integrative discrimination accuracy being 100%. The overall results indicate that blind seed selection is relevant to the miniaturization of the cultured population, and that there are some morphological differences among the four populations, e.g. characteristics of carapace.
Key words:  Marsupenaeus japonicus, Morphological difference, Cluster analysis, Discriminant analysis, Principal component analysis
版权所有 海洋与湖沼 Oceanologia et Limnlolgia Sinica Copyright©2008 All Rights Reserved
主管单位:中国科协技术协会 主办单位:中国海洋湖沼学会
地址:青岛市福山路32号  邮编:266071  电话:0532-82898753  E-mail:ols@qdio.ac.cn
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司