首页 | 期刊简介 | 编委会 | 投稿指南 | 常用下载 | 联系我们 | 期刊订阅 | In English
引用本文:李 伟,王玉衡,汪嘉宁,魏 皓.2011年春、夏季黄、东海水团与水文结构分布特征.海洋与湖沼,2012,43(3):615-623.
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器  关闭
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 3476次   下载 3121 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
2011年春、夏季黄、东海水团与水文结构分布特征
李 伟1, 王玉衡1, 汪嘉宁2, 魏 皓1
1.天津科技大学海洋科学与工程学院;2.中国海洋大学海洋环境学院 物理海洋教育部重点实验室
摘要:
根据2011年春季(4月)夏季(8月)两个航次调查的CTD温盐资料, 获得观测期间黄、东海主要水团特征: (1) 夏季黄海冷水团10℃等温线在黄海海域中部30m以深, 影响范围西至122°E南至34°N, 最低温度为6.2℃, 比气候态平均冷水团温度低约2℃; (2) 夏季冲淡水以长江口为中心, 呈半圆形向外扩展, 并无明显NE转向, 30.00 等盐线在32°N断面上东至124°E, 南至29.5°N, 扩展范围与往年相比偏西1°左右, 而在SE方向较往年有明显延伸扩展。水文结构特征为: (1) 春季, 温跃层主要在南黄海中部以西, 跃层强度仅为0.10—0.40℃/m; 密跃层主要在长江口以东, 跃层强度0.20—0.30kg/m4; (2) 夏季, 温跃层强度最高值在长江口东北, 跃层强度达到2.41℃/m, 上界深度5.5m, 厚度2.5m; 黄海温跃层强度普遍强于东海, 主要是冷水团区域表底显著的温度差异造成; 密跃层强度高值区在33°N断面西侧海区, 强度达到1.38kg/m4, 上界深度5.5m, 厚度约为1.5m; 沿长江冲淡水舌轴方向的密跃层强度为0.30—0.60kg/m4, 自西向东逐渐减弱。
关键词:  水团与水文结构季节变化, 温跃层, 密跃层, 黄、东海
DOI:10.11693/hyhz201203032032
分类号:
基金项目:国家重点基础研究发展计划(973)项目, 2011CB403606 号; 国家自然科学基金重点项目, 40830854 号
附件
DISTRIBUTIONS OF WATER MASSES AND HYDROGRAPHIC STRUCTURES IN THE YELLOW SEA AND EAST CHINA SEA IN SPRING AND SUMMER 2011
LI Wei1, WANG Yu-Heng1, WANG Jia-Ning2, WEI Hao1
1.College of Marine Science and Engineering, Tianjin University of Science and Technology;2.Laboratory of Physical Oceanography, College of Physical and Environmental Oceanography, Ocean University of China
Abstract:
Temperatures and salinities structures and water masses varied significantly with season in the Yellow Sea and East China Sea. The two cruises were carried out in spring (April) and summer (August) of 2011 to investigate the reasons of jelly fish break-out. It was found that (1) 10℃ isotherm which stood for the Yellow Sea Cold Water in summer consisted in the central of the Yellow Sea below the 30m depth, the range extended to 122°E in the west and to 34°N in the south. The lowest temperature was 6.2℃, which was 2.0℃lower than the average climatological value; (2) The Changjiang River Diluted water spread eastward in semicircle centered in the Changjiang River mouth in summer. No obvious northeastward direction-turning was found and the 30.00 isohaline extended to 124°E in the east and to 29.5°N in the south. The Changjiang River Diluted water extension was about 1°west along 32°N section but distinctly extended to southeastward compared with the averages; (3) Taiwan Warm Current water could reach 28°N and 30°N in the surface and bottom layer in spring, respectively. It was not observed in the 0—30m layer in summer. It extended to 30.5°N in the northward in the bottom. Hydrographic structures were (1) in spring, the thermocline lay in the center of the Yellow Sea. The thermocline intensity was 0.10—0.40℃/m. The pycnocline lay in the east of Changjiang River estuary and the intensity was 0.20—0.30kg/m4; (2) in summer, the maximum value of the thermocline intensity (2.41℃/m) lay in the northeast of Changjiang River mouth with upper depth at 5.5m and 2.5m thickness. The thermocline intensity in the Yellow Sea was stronger than that in the East China Sea because of remarkable temperature difference in the surface and bottom affected by the Yellow Sea Cold Water; (3) The distribution of pycnocline intensity was almost the same as the thermocline in summer and the maximum value of the pycnocline intensity (1.38kg/m4) lay in the west of 33°N section. The pycnocline upper depth was 5.5m and thickness was 1.5m. Pycnocline intensity along the tongue axes of the Changjiang River Diluted water was 0.30—0.60kg/m4, weakening from west to east. The intensity of thermocline and pycnocline gradually got weaker while the upper depth and thickness got stronger from offshore to the central shelf sea.
Key words:  Seasonal variation of water mass and hydrographical structure, Thermocline, Pycnocline, Yellow Sea and East China Sea
版权所有 海洋与湖沼 Oceanologia et Limnlolgia Sinica Copyright©2008 All Rights Reserved
主管单位:中国科协技术协会 主办单位:中国海洋湖沼学会
地址:青岛市海军路88号  邮编:266400  电话:0532-82898753  E-mail:ols@qdio.ac.cn
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司