引用本文:	徐艳东,魏潇,杨建敏,唐海田,吴兴伟,马建新.山东近岸海域表层沉积物7 种重金属污染特征和生态风险评估研究.海洋与湖沼,2015,46(3):651-658.

【打印本页】【HTML】【下载PDF全文】【查看/发表评论】【下载PDF阅读器】【关闭】

过刊浏览高级检索

本文已被：浏览 3306次下载 2577次	码上扫一扫！
分享到：微信更多字体:加大+\|默认\|缩小-
山东近岸海域表层沉积物7 种重金属污染特征和生态风险评估研究
徐艳东^1,2, 魏潇¹, 杨建敏¹, 唐海田³, 吴兴伟¹, 马建新¹
1.山东省海洋资源与环境研究院山东省海洋生态修复重点实验室烟台 264006;2.中国海洋大学环境科学与工程学院青岛 266100;3.国家海洋局烟台海洋环境监测中心站烟台 264006

摘要:

本文综合运用单因子污染指数法、Hakanson 潜在生态风险指数法和沉积物质量基准法3 种方法, 研究和评价了2012 年和2013 年山东近岸海域表层沉积物重金属的污染特征和潜在生态风险。结果表明: 山东近岸海域94%以上站位的表层沉积物重金属含量符合第一类海洋沉积物质量标准,沉积物质量良好; 山东近岸海域重金属综合潜在生态风险低, 各重金属潜在生态风险由高到低为Hg>As>Cd>Pb>Cu>Cr>Zn (2012 年)和Hg>Cd>As>Pb>Cu>Cr>Zn (2013 年), Hg 在个别站位达中潜在生态风险程度, 为主要污染因子; 50%以上站位As 含量介于美国佛罗里达州和加拿大沉积物质量基准的TEL—PEL 之间, 表明负面生物效应偶尔发生。应加强对山东近岸海域表层沉积物中重金属Hg和As 的监测, 重点关注二者相对高值区的潜在生态风险和负面生物效应。

关键词: 重金属沉积物生态风险评估山东近岸海域

DOI：10.11693/hyhz20141200358

分类号:

基金项目:国家海洋公益性行业专项经费项目, 201105006 号, 201205001 号; 烟台市科学技术发展计划项目, 2008160 号; 黄河三角洲学者——海洋生物遗传育种岗位。

附件

CONTAMINANT CHARACTERISTICS AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT ON POLLUTION BY SEVEN HEAVY METALS IN SURFACE SEDIMENTS IN SHANDONG COASTAL AREAS

XU Yan-Dong^1,2, WEI Xiao¹, YANG Jian-Min¹, TANG Hai-Tian³, WU Xing-Wei¹, MA Jian-Xin¹

1.Shandong Marine Resource and Environment Research Institute, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Restoration for Marine Ecology, Yantai, 264006;2.College of Environment Science and Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266100;3.Yantai Marine Environment Monitoring Central Station, State Oceanic Administration, Yantai 264006, China

Abstract:

With field observation data of heavy metal pollution in surface sediments in Shandong coastal areas in 2012 and 2013, we assessed the ecological risk in these areas by adopting three different indices, i.e., single factor index (SFI), Hakanson's potential ecological risk index (PERI), and sediment quality guidelines (SQG). The results show that among 38 monitoring stations, 94% of them were in rather good status whose heavy metal contents in surface sediments comply with the national first-class benchmark in marine sediment quality. The heavy metals were at the low level of comprehensive potential ecological risk, in descending order of Hg>As>Cd>Pb>Cu>Cr>Zn (in 2012) and Hg>Cd>As>Pb>Cu>Cr>Zn (in 2013). Mercury was determined as the principal pollution factor, as its potential ecological risk was moderate in few stations; arsenic contents were between the TEL (threshold effect level) and PEL (probable effect level) in American (Florida) and Canadian guidelines in over half of the stations, showing occasional adverse biological effects. Therefore, close watchout and stringent control shall be taken to prevent mercury and arsenic pollutions, and special attentions shall be paid to potential ecological risk and adverse biological effects in the coastal areas to lower relatively high values.

Key words: heavy metals sediments ecological risk assessment Shandong coastal areas