首页 | 期刊简介 | 编委会 | 投稿指南 | 常用下载 | 联系我们 | 期刊订阅 | In English
引用本文:刘梅,原居林,倪蒙,练青平,郭爱环.大口黑鲈(Micropterus salmoides)不同养殖模式氮磷收支及养殖效果研究.海洋与湖沼,2021,52(3):718-728.
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器  关闭
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 813次   下载 566 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
大口黑鲈(Micropterus salmoides)不同养殖模式氮磷收支及养殖效果研究
刘梅, 原居林, 倪蒙, 练青平, 郭爱环
农业农村部淡水渔业健康养殖重点实验室 浙江省淡水水产遗传育种重点实验室 浙江省淡水水产研究所 湖州 313001
摘要:
为了揭示池塘内循环流水养殖模式(Inner-Pond Raceway Aquaculture,IPRA)氮磷收支变化及养殖效果情况,阐明其生态特征及营养物质的来源与归宿,合理评价IPRA的经济与生态效益,通过定期采样计算氮磷的输入和输出项目,同时设置传统常规养殖池塘(usual pond aquaculture,UPA)为对照组。结果表明:(1)两种养殖模式中,饲料是池塘氮、磷输入的主要来源,分别占IPRA和UPA池塘氮输入的95.02%±2.31%和94.57%±1.82%,占两种模式磷输入的93.19%±2.75%和91.81%±4.44%;(2)底泥沉积是氮、磷输出的主要方式,占IPRA和UPA氮输出的45.16%±1.31%和53.98%±1.48%,占磷输出的40.28%±3.19%和59.59%±4.45%,差异显著(P<0.05),其次是养殖产出,IPRA渔获物氮输出比例37.73%±0.91%高于UPA的35.07%±0.99%,差异不显著(P>0.05),磷输出比例25.50%±1.77%显著高于UPA的20.78%±1.33%(P<0.05);(3) IPRA对氮的绝对和相对利用率高于UPA,但差异不显著(P>0.05),而对磷的利用率显著高于UPA (P<0.05),IPRA提高了养殖对象对氮、磷的吸收利用率;(4) IPRA耗水系数、排水系数及排污系数均显著低于UPA (P<0.05),但IPRA养殖效益显著高于UPA (P<0.05)。综上所述,IPRA是一种清洁高效的新型养殖模式,可以进行推广应用。本研究旨在为今后更好地开展IPRA水质管理和科学养殖提供数据支撑,同时为IPRA模式在节水生态、经济效益等评价方面提供理论依据。
关键词:  池塘内循环流水养殖  大口黑鲈(Micropterus salmoides)  氮磷收支  养殖效果
DOI:10.11693/hyhz20200900242
分类号:
基金项目:国家重点研发计划项目,2020YFD0900105号;浙江省农业重大技术协同推广项目,2020XTTGSC01号;湖州公益性重点应用研究项目,2019GZ17号;浙江省省属院所扶持专项,2021YSZX006号。
附件
A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON NITROGEN AND PHOSPHORUS BUDGET AND AQUACULTURE EFFECT OF MICROPTERUS SALMOIDES IN TWO MODES
LIU Mei, YUAN Ju-Lin, NI Meng, LIAN Qing-Ping, GUO Ai-Huan
Agriculture Ministry Key Laboratory of Healthy Freshwater Aquaculture, Key Laboratory of Freshwater Aquaculture Genetic and Breeding of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Institute of Freshwater Fisheries, Huzhou 313001, China
Abstract:
To discuss the changes of nitrogen and phosphorus budget and aquaculture effect of Inner-Pond Raceway Aquaculture (IPRA) mode, expound its ecological characteristics, nutrient orientation, and rationally evaluate the ecological and economic benefits of IPRA, the input and output of nitrogen and phosphorus were analyzed based on regular sampling. Meanwhile, the usual pond aquaculture (UPA) mode was set as the control treatment. Results show that:(1) Feed was the main source of nitrogen and phosphorus input, accounting for 95.02%±2.31% and 94.57%±1.82% of the nitrogen input, and 93.19%±2.75% and 91.81%±4.44% of the phosphorus input in IPRA and UPA modes respectively. (2) Sediment deposition was the main mode of nitrogen and phosphorus output, accounting for 45.16%±1.31% and 53.98%±1.48% of nitrogen output as well as 40.28%±3.19% and 59.59%±4.45% of phosphorus output in IPRA and UPA in P<0.05, respectively. The second part was the fish output, accounting for 37.73%±0.91% and 35.07%±0.99% of the nitrogen output in IPRA and UPA with P>0.05 and 25.50%±1.77% and 20.78%±1.33% of the phosphorus output in IPRA and UPA with P<0.05, respectively. (3) The relative and absolute utilization rates of nitrogen and phosphorus in IPRA mode were significantly higher than those in UPA (P<0.05). IPRA improved the utilization rates of nitrogen and phosphorus in the breeding objects. (4) The water consumption coefficient, drainage coefficient, and pollution discharge coefficient of IPRA were significantly lower than those of UPA (P<0.05). The profit of IPRA was significantly higher than that of UPA (P<0.05). Above all, the IPRA is a clean and efficient new aquaculture mode, which can be promoted and applied. This study provided a data support for better implementation of water quality management and scientific aquaculture for IPRA in the future, and built a theoretical basis for the evaluation of IPRA in water-saving ecology and other aspects.
Key words:  Inner-Pond Raceway Aquaculture  Micropterus salmoides  nitrogen and phosphorus budget  aquaculture effect
版权所有 海洋与湖沼 Oceanologia et Limnlolgia Sinica Copyright©2008 All Rights Reserved
主管单位:中国科协技术协会 主办单位:中国海洋湖沼学会
地址:青岛市福山路32号  邮编:266071  电话:0532-82898753  E-mail:ols@qdio.ac.cn
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司